The traditional stereotype of feminist in this country is an unattractive woman who hates men and sex. In an effort to combat this stereotype, a lot of younger feminists have latched onto the idea of "sex positivity". While I have no problem with the idea of being "sex positive," this has many unfortunate results in both theory and practice. Among them are the knee-jerk condemnations of many of our feminist elders who wrote about the negative consequences of sex in traditional heterosexual relationships, the blanket approval of prostitution and other sex work without any honest evaluation of its effects on women (and men) working in the sex industry, and the idea that any sexual activity is acceptable and beyond judgment. While all of those positions have understandable underpinnings, they often go overboard and focus too much on apologizing for feminism and ignoring the motivation behind the original critiques.
The first thing to consider before getting into any particular issue is the idea of choice. Choice is what feminism is about. It's not about prescribing or restricting choices for women (or men, for that matter), but about providing everyone with the chance to make their own choices. That's an admirable goal, and it's one that I support. The problem is that many contemporary feminists also take this to mean that the right to make a choice means that every choice is equally valid and equally "good" for the woman involved or women as a whole. This would rightfully fall under the category of ethical relativism, which is in direct contradiction to women's rights, in particular, and human rights, in general. Ethical relativism can lead to insane places, such as the approval of murder, as explained by anthropologist Ruth Benedict:
We might suppose that in the matter of taking life all peoples would agree on condemnation. On the contrary, in the matter of homicide, it may be held that one kills by custom his two children, or that a husband has a right of life and death over his wife or that it is the duty of the child to kill his parents before they are old. It may be the case that those are killed who steal fowl, or who cut their upper teeth first, or who are born on Wednesday. Among some peoples, a person suffers torment at having caused an accidental death, among others, it is a matter of no consequence. Suicide may also be a light matter, the recourse of anyone who has suffered some slight rebuff, an act that constantly occurs in a tribe. It may be the highest and noblest act a wise man can perform. The very tale of it, on the other hand, may be a matter for incredulous mirth, and the act itself, impossible to conceive as human possibility. Or it may be a crime punishable by law, or regarded as a sin against the gods. (pp. 45-46)
For example, it is still a custom in many African tribes to kill so-called mingi children to protect the tribe. Ethical relativism is a dangerous, slippery slope than can be used to justify everything from infanticide to genital mutilation of both sexes to so-called "honor killings." Since the wider concept of human rights and the sex-specific concept of women's rights both hold that there are certain rights that belong to all people, no matter what their culture, ethical relativism has to be rejected by anyone who truly supports these concepts. Unfortunately, this ethical relativist stance is taken by many feminists who argue for the validity of all "choices."
One of the main tactics taken by many of these contemporary feminists is to try to ingratiate themselves with patriarchy by condemning so-called radical feminists of the past. Andrea Dworkin and other anti-pornography feminists are common targets. Andrea Dworkin is a prime target because of the out-of-context quote from one of her books equating all heterosexual sex to rape. In an effort to show themselves as "good" feminists, these women strip that quote from all context of time and explanation. Dworkin did make such a statement, but she also explained what the statement meant. She was describing the traditional situation in which women are expected to trade sex for economic survival, i.e. traditional marriage. Her question was whether it was possible for a woman to give true consent if she had no choice but to give up sex in order to gain the economic means to support herself and her children, the very means of survival. If consent is based upon having no choice but to say yes, is it really consent? I would say that is an important question still, especially when we consider those who argue for work in the sex industry as a valid choice.
It doesn't matter whether you're on Facebook, in the blogosphere, or on the website of a feminist organization, you're going to find younger feminists trying to tie the sex industry and sex positivity inextricably together. The problem is that sex work is generally that -- work -- not a sexual outlet. Some 20-plus years ago, it was work I did. Before becoming pregnant with my oldest child, I worked in several topless bars around the city for a while. I had many other friends who worked the clubs or worked as prostitutes on the street. As women, we had the option of the clubs or the street. My male friends generally just had the street. Not one of us was there for sex or because we wanted to be there. Every last one of us was there because of an addiction to street drugs. Every last one. A few of the women I met at the club were there because they were very young single moms with no skills. Taking their clothes off for cash was the only way to put food on the table. Again, sex was not the motivating factor here, folks. Whether it was having some creep follow us home from the club, contracting life-threatening diseases, having clients want to do violent things to our bodies, or being strip-searched by management because some rich asshole lost the cash he was flashing around the club, every last one of us experienced frightening, humiliating, dangerous, and ultimately life-altering repercussions. It wasn't sexy. It wasn't fun. It was soul-sucking.
A couple of years ago, I lived in a neighborhood that is home to most of the city's street prostitutes. Many of the women would bring their boyfriends out to keep watch over them. The man would sit a distance away. Not close enough to scare johns away, but close enough that they could be seen. Why? So the john would know someone had seen him and his vehicle, should the woman not come back safely. Sexy? How about life-threatening, folks.
Even when a woman is working in a legal operation, either a strip club or a legal brothel, she's not likely to be treated well by the management. They take your money in the clubs. In the brothels, the women are forced to undergo regular medical check-ups to keep the clients safe. I want to know who's making sure the clients are healthy and not giving the women diseases that could threaten their lives? After all, it is much easier for a woman to get a sexually-transmitted infection from a man than the other way around. This is especially true when you're talking about blood-borne infections like HIV or Hep C. A woman's body is more likely to end up torn, giving the pathogen an easy entrance to her bloodstream.
Of course, the club owners, like any pimps, have no concern about the women who work for them. Do they know that the majority of their employees are addicts? Hell yes, they know. The women teach each other what make-up to buy and how to properly apply it to cover up track marks. They teach each other which articles of clothing will work for the same purpose. Elbow-length black gloves are a favorite of junkies who work the clubs. The owners don't care, as long as the marks don't show. Track marks were treated the same as tattoos -- you can have them, as long as they don't show.
The other issues that pro-prostitution feminists try desperately to ignore are trafficking and child prostitution. They claim those are completely separate issues. Ummm....no, they are not. They are not synonymous, but trafficking and child prostitution exist because prostitution itself exists. Not all prostitutes are children nor are they all trafficked. However, all trafficked females and child sex workers are prostitutes. As an Arizonan, I am well aware how easy it is to exploit those who end up in the U.S. without papers. The exploitation and victimization is a widespread and real problem without prostitution being part of the equation. Adding the trafficking of female bodies for the sex trade makes it mind-numbing. The men who use these women's bodies see it as no different than going to see any other prostitute. In fact, they may not even know that these women are any different than any other prostitute. Simply changing the law to decriminalize is not going to fix that problem as long as the undocumented are afraid for themselves or people back home.
And therein lies the problem with many pro-prostitution feminists: they claim that decriminalization will fix all the current problems associated with prostitution. They claim it will eliminate the violence experienced by so many prostitutes. They claim it will eliminate the stigma. I just don't know how the hell they're arriving at that conclusion. This is a society that hasn't eliminated violence against women outside the ranks of prostitution. There are many men who go to prostitutes specifically because they are looking to inflict pain and violence on a woman. Will the law make those men disappear? Hell, we have attitudes within law enforcement and general society that dismiss and minimize the violence against prostitutes. The idea that a prostitute can't be raped is still firmly entrenched. The unwillingness to vigorously pursue those who beat, rape, or even murder prostitutes is common. Those are deeply ingrained in our culture. Decriminalization of prostitution will not magically fix all those problems. Those problems are about misogyny.
So, what of the biggest money-maker in the sex industry? What of pornography? I've read and seen my share of porn, whether it was labeled as such or called "erotica". I can't speak to most of the women in that industry, because I have never known anyone who worked in it. The closest I came to knowing anyone in that part of the industry was reading Ordeal, the autobiography of Linda Boreman (aka Linda Lovelace). It did not paint a pretty picture of her life as the star of the "revolutionary" pornographic film Deep Throat. As much as it tried to gloss over the issues, neither did the 2005 documentary Inside Deep Throat.
Boreman talked of being beaten by Chuck Traynor throughout their relationship. Everyone on set knew of this, as they had to cover the bruises in order to shoot the movie. Others who worked on the film have admitted that they knew he was beating her. They covered up and pushed on. Of course, the movie was produced by mobsters. The documentary Inside Deep Throat fails to mention the beatings and bruises, but they do let one thing slip: they discuss Boreman being taken into a room full of mobsters by Traynor and told to give a couple of the mobsters blow jobs in order to get the funding. Was everything that went wrong in Boreman's life a result of that movie? Of course not. However, anyone who praises that movie without acknowledging the horrors of it's production are really missing something in the way of humanity. Unfortunately, others from the porn industry, such as Annie Sprinkle, have done just that.
Of course, no one is suggesting that every porn flick ever made was shot under the same circumstances as Deep Throat. That would be ludicrous. However, the actress doesn't have to be tortured for there to be something off about the end-product. One money shot after another is a woman on her knees having some asshole shoot his wad into her face. The desire to degrade is obvious. One website invites "bitches" to "gag on my c*ck." It features pictures of women with t-shirts labeling them as stupid which are linked to videos of some guy almost making them puke while calling them names and telling them that this will shut them up, like women should shut up. It's awful that these exist. It's worse that women, for whatever reason, involve themselves in this kind of verbal degradation and violent sex. Yes, it's a choice. And these women are free to make it. However, anyone who thinks that it's not nauseating and misogynistic is a freaking idiot.
Then, we end up in the realm of BDSM. Another choice that we're told not to judge. Even worse, we are told again and again that it's actually the bottom who is in charge. Okay, whatever. We will even find women who say in one breath it's empowering, then in the next admit that many female submissives have been sexually abused in the past. Instead of admitting that this may be a way of internalizing the male violence, they suggests it's a "healthy" way to "work it out." Hmmm.....I have my doubts.
If you want to believe any of that crap, feel free. My problem with BDSM has more to do with the literature. The latest craze, 50 Shades of Grey, has been condemned even by some BDSM devotees as a celebration of a violent relationship, found guilty of romanticizing violence. That's not even the biggest problem I have with BDSM literature, though, especially that purportedly written by women. My bigger issue is that so much of it revels in the idea of women being powerless outside the bedroom.
One site, which once presented itself as "erotica for women," has made a living off this crap. Oysters and Chocolate is an "erotica" site started by two women. In interviews, these women have whined that they are feminist, and how dare these mean ol' women attack them for having an anti-feminist message. Meanwhile, they publish series like that written by a woman named Kris Williams. (The series has since been made into a book, so it is no longer available for reading without purchase.) In this series, the male who tortures his lover makes it clear that he hates feminists. The author also writes that he tortures his lover because he doesn't want her to have any power over him. What power, you might ask? Oh, the fact that he loves her gives her power. So, to clear that nonsense out, he beats and humiliates her. He revels in her fear. That is reinforced over and over again. Fear is key. It's what he gets off on. Knowing that she is afraid of him. The introduction of BDSM into their relationship isn't one they have agreed on together; it's one he enforces under threat. That doesn't sound like the "bottom in control" idea that the BDSM crowd is so fond of selling. Yet, it is what the literature reveals as a driving motivation. Tell me in what freaking way that is "feminist."
In the end, I am firmly committed to the idea that people are free to make their own choices. As a free speech absolutist, I will also passionately defend the rights of everyone to say and otherwise express themselves however they choose. Holocaust denier? Have your say. Homophobe? Have your say. Woman-hating pornographer? Have your say. The fact that others are free to make their own choices and free to express themselves in whatever way they see fit does not, however, mean that all of these choices and expressions are worthy of praise. It does not mean they are "sex positive." And it sure as hell doesn't make these choices or expressions "feminist."
NOTE: The above article was originally posted at Kim's blog "Righteous Anger" here, and has been reposted at AntiPornography.org at Kim's request.
Did you know that you can help our organization and cause FOR FREE? Yes! Every time you shop at Amazon via AmazonSmile, which is Amazon's charity program, Amazon will donate a percentage of your total order -- at NO EXTRA COST to you! All you need to do is click on our custom AmazonSmile link or the image below, and confirm your selection of our organization just once as your AmazonSmile charity. Then just shop via http://smile.amazon.com from here on out when you want to shop at Amazon, and the rest will happen automatically. If you have any questions or concerns about this program, Amazon provides full info here. ~~ Many thanks to all who help us out this way! We really appreciate it! :-)
THANKS AGAIN! YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE CAUSE IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED!
A URL shortcut for this website is AntiPorn.org or antiporn.org. Thank you!
Please feel free to add this button to your blog or website. It will bring people here to AntiPornography.org so that they will be able to learn exactly how pornography hurts people and what they can do to help. Get HTML code here.
PLEASE NOTE THAT EVERY PAGE ON THIS WEBSITE IS A WORK IN PROGRESS AND WILL BE ADDED TO AND IMPROVED OVER TIME. IF YOU WOULD LIKE THIS SITE TO BE EXPANDED AND IMPROVED MORE QUICKLY, SO WE CAN DO MORE TO PREVENT AND COMBAT THE HARMS OF PORNOGRAPHY, PROSTITUTION AND SEX TRAFFICKING, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DONATE MUCH NEEDED FUNDS OR VOLUNTEER YOUR TIME. THANKS! DONATE HERE - VOLUNTEER HERE
BELOW IS THE BEGINNING OF OUR WEBSITE FOOTER WITH OUR SOCIAL NETWORKING LINKS, NEWSLETTER FORM, DONATION BUTTON, AND COMPREHENSIVE ANTI-PORNOGRAPHY, ANTI-PROSTITUTION, ANTI-SEX TRAFFICKING AND RELATED RESOURCES. IF YOU FEEL SOMETHING IS MISSING AND SHOULD BE ADDED TO THESE RESOURCES, WHETHER IT IS YOUR OWN WEBSITE OR PROJECT, OR ANOTHER RESOURCE CREATED BY SOMEONE ELSE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SUBMIT IT HERE. THANKS!
Please submit events, action alerts and media alerts here.
Click picture above to order "PORNLAND" at Amazon.com now!
Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexualitytakes an unflinching look at today’s porn industry: the stories woven into the images, the impact on our culture, the effects on us as men and women, the business machine that creates and markets porn, and the growing legitimacy of porn in mainstream media. Above all, PORNLAND examines the way porn shapes and limits sexual imaginations and behaviors.
Although we are surrounded by pornographic images, many people are not aware of just how cruel and violent the industry is today. PORNLANDshows how today’s porn is strikingly different from yesterday’s Playboy and Penthouse magazines — how competition in the industry and consumer desensitization have pushed porn toward hard core extremes. And, with the advent of the internet and other digital technologies, users don’t have to wander far to access porn; todaythe average age of first viewing is about 11 for boys, and studies reveal that young men, who consume more porn than ever before, have difficulty forming healthy relationships.
PORNLAND also looks at how our porn culture affects the way women and girls think about their bodies, their sexuality and their relationships. PORNLAND: How Porn has Hijacked our Sexuality argues that rather than sexually liberating or empowering us, porn offers us a plasticized, formulaic, generic version of sex that is boring, lacking in creativity and disconnected from emotion and intimacy.
CLICK PICTURES ABOVE TO ORDER "PORNLAND" AT AMAZON.COM NOW
Please pardon any errors, omissions, or technical problems, etc., with this website, and please feel free to help us out by informing us about them here. Thanks. And if you would like to contribute to this website being developed more quickly, please feel free to donate here. Thank you! Your support is very much appreciated and will definitely make a difference.
"Dedicated to providing the most accurate peer-reviewed research on the harm from pornography, along with relevant news and opinion."
This outstanding website comprehensively addresses the harms of pornography in regards to all of the following categories: addiction, brain science, children, cybersex, family, Internet, Internet safety, marriage, men, psychological, prostitution, relationships, research, self image, sex trafficking, sexting, sexual violence, societal, STDs, teens, and women.
Have you taken the NO-PORN PLEDGE at NoPornPledge.com yet? If not, now would be a really great time to do so! Please click here or the banner below.
See the list of many people from all around the world who have signed the No-Porn Pledge. Click here.
Read the reasons why they have signed in the No-PornPledge Guestbook. Click here. Don't forget to join them by signing the pledge and sharing your reasons why in the guestbook there as well!
"Join a growing number of people who have made a decision to eliminate porn from their lives. Sign your name, and publicly declare that you won't use porn, or have an intimate relationship with anyone who does."
At AntiPornography.orgwe are working to prevent and combat the devastating harms of pornography, prostitution, sex trafficking and sexual slavery, as well as all other forms of sexual exploitation, through public education and advocacy. We are:
Pro-Education, Pro Safe, Healthy, Respectful, Equality-Based Sexuality
Pro-reasonable regulation of the pornography industry for the health and safety of the performers.
*Please see FAQ for more information on all of the above. Thank you!
RESOURCES, FRIENDS, SUPPORTERS AND ALLIES:
NOTE: All those marked with * are friends, subscribers or followers of AntiPornography.org at Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, or one of our other social networking websites, or have demonstrated support for our work otherwise, such as providing content for this website or linking to us or to one of our blogs and/or social networking projects. Also please note that the below list is a work in progress and that it is not complete. Please share any errors, omissions or suggestions here. Thank you!
WOMEN AND GIRLS FOCUSED RESOURCES:
(For family, children, men and addiction focused resources, please scroll down.)
ANTI-PORNOGRAPHY ORGANIZATIONS GROUPS AND WEBSITES:
Saavi Accountability -- The only online accountability program that works with all online addictions. It is also the only program that sends notifications instantly via text message to an accountability partner so that they can be supportive when an individual needs it the most at the point of weakness, while they are accessing the online content. The software was created by a young man (26) who overcame his addiction and is trying to help others.
ADDICTION MESSAGE BOARDS & DISCUSSION FORUMS FOR HELP & SUPPORT:
(Note: The No Porn Northampton FAQ is in the bottom half of their sidebar. In addition to the usual questions about pornography it addresses questions and concerns about activism against sexually oriented businesses such as "adult bookstores.")
"Pornography is a marketing device for sex trafficking: It normalizes degradation and violence as acceptable and even inevitable parts of sex, and uses the bodies of real women and children as objects. The difference between pornography and erotica is clear in the roots of the words themselves -- porne means females slaves, eros means love -- so pornography, like rape, is about violence and domination, not sex. Millions of lives depend on our ability to separate pornography from erotica, and to disentangle violence from sexuality."
Gloria Steinem, 2006
For information about Gloria Steinem's important work of fighting against the harms of pornography, sex trafficking and other forms of sexual exploitation and abuse, including videos and an audio interview, please see our page on Gloria Steinem. Click here.
YOUR HELP IS NEEDED. PLEASE DONATE IF YOU ARE ABLE TO.
Please remember that it is not up to AntiPornography.org, the other organizations listed on this page, the government, or "someone else" to do the entire job of fighting against the devastating harms of pornography, prostitution, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation or abuse. It is an enormous job and the responsibility lies with each and every one of us to do our part as part of the bigger team of those who are choosing to be part of the solution of creating a more just and humane world for everyone, rather than be part of the problem.
So thank you in advance for whatever you are able to contribute to the cause, whether in the form of a tax-deductible donation or your actions. What you do does matter, so for the sake of all those across the world who are being exploited and abused, and for the sake of the future of humanity, please do what you can to create a more compassionate and safer society for all.
Thank you for whatever you are able to give or do to help create a better world for everyone, especially for women, children and future generations.
YOUR SUPPORTIVE ACTIONS & YOUR DONATIONS ARE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED.
ALSO PLEASE LIKE OUR FAN PAGE AT FACEBOOK BELOW, AND PLEASE SUPPORT THE CAUSE BY SHARING ANTI-PORN AND RELATED ARTICLES, RESOURCES AND COMMENTS WITH US THERE. THANKS! WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU!
THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT! IT'S VERY MUCH APPRECIATED AND REALLY MAKES A DIFFERENCE!
*DISCLAIMER: Inclusion of a resource above or anywhere on this website does not constitute endorsement of or agreement with all of the content of that resource, and does not constitute a claim that all content included in that resource is wholly accurate. Those who created the resource are solely accountable for the opinions and information in their own content that they have authored, as well as for their own personal, social and political opinions and positions in general, as well as being responsible for the ever-changing content of their own websites. If anyone has any concerns about any content on anyone else's website that is linked to from this website, please contact the other website in question, not AntiPornography.org. If anyone has any concerns about any content on this website that was authored or created by anyone other than AntiPornography.org, please contact those responsible for the creation of the content so that they can edit or amend their own original content as appropriate and then inform all others who have it posted elsewhere. If that is not possible and a fact correction or edit is necessary, please contact us with full references provided regarding why the information is inaccurate so that we can correct or edit the content as appropriate. Please also do the same regarding any original content posted on this website authored by AntiPornography.org. Thank you! Also please note that no materials are posted on this website with malicious intent and that documented fact corrections are always welcome. Finally, please only take what you find to be useful and informative from this website and/or any particular resource listed here and leave the rest behind. It is not expected that everyone will agree with or find useful the entire content of this website, only that some people will find some of the content useful or informative.
Re: Copyrighted documentaries and television shows on this website: None of them were uploaded to the Internet by AntiPornography.org or related websites. They were all uploaded by others to other websites and are merely embedded here for people to view them here as opposed to them viewing at the other websites where they are currently made available for viewing. If you are the copyright owner of any content on this website and you have an objection to it being available on the Internet, please contact the person who uploaded it and/or the website where is it is uploaded in order to get it removed from that website. When that occurs it will also automatically be removed from this website. Thank you. (Note: The exception to this is the Tyra Show episode "Teens in the Sex Trade," which was uploaded by our AntiPornographyBlog YouTube channel and has the permission of the copyright owner to be posted there.)
*** All original content on this web site is copyrighted by AntiPornography.org. Please do not repost any content except for small excerpts with a link provided acknowledging the source and directing people to this website to read the rest. Thank you.
AntiPornography.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.